How Would You Know if the Balance Sheet You Were Reading Was Telling the Whole Story?
The stray art of lying by telling the truth
(Epitome credit:
Getty Images
)
The line betwixt truth and lies is becoming e'er murkier, finds Melissa Hogenboom. There's fifty-fifty a word for a very different form of lying.
I
Information technology is no hugger-mugger that politicians often lie, but consider this – they can do then just by telling the truth. Confused?
That argument becomes clearer when yous realise that nosotros've probably all done it. A classic example might be if your mum asks if you've finished your homework and y'all reply: "I've written an essay on Tennessee Williams for my English grade." This may be true, but it doesn't actually answer the question about whether your homework was done. That essay could have been written long agone and y'all accept misled your poor mother with a truthful statement. Yous might not have even started your homework notwithstanding.
Misleading by "telling the truth" is then pervasive in daily life that a new term has recently been employed by psychologists to depict it: paltering. That information technology is so widespread in order now gives us more insight into the grey area between truth and lies, and perhaps even why we prevarication at all.
Most of united states tell more than 1 lie per mean solar day (Credit: Everett Drove Inc/Alamy)
We lie all the time, despite the fact that it costs us considerably more mental effort to lie than to tell the truth. US president Abraham Lincoln once said that "no human being has a good enough retentiveness to exist a successful liar".
In 1996 one researcher, Bella DePaulo even put a figure on it. She found that each of us lies about once or twice a day. She discovered this by asking participants for i calendar week to note down each time they lied, even if they did so with a expert intention. Out of the 147 participants in her original study, merely seven said they didn't lie at all - and we can only approximate if they were telling the truth.
Many of the lies were fairly innocent, or fifty-fifty kind, such as: "I told her that she looked skilful when I idea that she looked like a blimp." Some were to hibernate embarrassment, such every bit pretending a spouse had not been fired. DePaulo, a psychologist at the Academy of California Santa Barbara, says that the participants in her study were not aware of how many lies they told, partly because most were so "ordinary and then expected that we just don't notice them".
It is when individuals use lies to manipulate others or to purposely mislead that it is more worrying. And this happens more often than y'all might think.
The truth is not always what it seems (Credit: Chris Rout/Alamy)
When Todd Rogers and his colleagues were looking at how often politicians dodge questions during debates they realised something else was going on. By stating another true fact, they could exit of answering a question. They could fifty-fifty imply something was truthful when it was not. Politicians practise this all the time, says Rogers, a behavioural scientist at Harvard Kennedy School. He and colleagues therefore set out to empathise more nigh it.
He institute that paltering was an extremely common tactic of negotiation. Over half the 184 business organisation executives in his study admitted to using the tactic. The research likewise plant that the person doing the paltering believed information technology was more than ethical than lying outright.
The individuals who had been deceived, however, did non distinguish betwixt lying and paltering. "It probably leads to too much paltering as communicators retrieve that when disclosed, it volition be somewhat upstanding, whereas listeners meet information technology every bit a lie," says Rogers.
Politicians commonly manipulate the truth (Credit: Getty Images)
It is also difficult to spot a misleading "fact" when we hear something that on the face of information technology, sounds true. For instance, the U.k.'southward Labour Party campaign video to lower the voting age said: "You're xvi. Now yous tin get married, join the Ground forces, work total-time." The BBC's reality cheque team discovered that these facts do non tell the whole truth.
"Y'all tin just join the Army aged xvi or 17 with your parents' permission," the Reality Check team wrote. "At that age you also need your parents' permission to get married unless yous do so in Scotland. Since 2013, sixteen and 17-year-olds cannot work full-time in England, simply can in the other three home nations with some restrictions."
In another case, the so-presidential-nominee Donald Trump paltered during the presidential debates. He was questioned almost a housing discrimination lawsuit early on in his career and stated that his company had given "no admission of guilt". While they may not have admitted information technology, an investigation by the New York Times constitute that his visitor did discriminate based on race.
And even if we practise spot misleading truths, social norms can prevent united states of america from challenging whether or not they are deceptive. Take a now infamous interview in the UK, where journalist Jeremy Paxman interviewed the politician Michael Howard (pictured below). He repeatedly asks Howard whether he "threatened to overrule" the then prisons governor. Howard in turn, continues to evade the question with other facts in a bizarre commutation that becomes increasingly awkward to watch. Not many of us are comfy challenging someone in that way.
Paltering is a common negotiation tactic (Credit: BBC)
While information technology's common in politics, so likewise is information technology in everyday life. Consider the estate agent who tells a potential buyer that an unpopular belongings has had "lots of enquiries" when asked how many actual bids at that place accept been. Or the used motorcar salesman who says a motorcar started up extremely well on a frosty morning, without disclosing that it broke downward the week earlier. Both statements are true but mask the reality of the unpopular holding and the dodgy car.
Paltering is perhaps so commonplace considering it is seen as a useful tool. Information technology happens because we constantly take so many competing goals, suggests Rogers. "We want to accomplish our narrow objective – [selling a firm or auto] – but nosotros also desire people to see the states as upstanding and honest." He says these two goals are in tension and by paltering, people believe they are being more ethical than outright lying. "We bear witness show they are making a fault," says Rogers.
We can encounter the problems this sort of thinking can cause reflected in club today. The public are conspicuously ill of beingness lied to and trust in politicians is plummeting. One 2016 poll constitute that the British public trust politicians less than manor agents, bankers and journalists.
And despite the fact that we now often look lies from those in ability, it remains challenging to spot them in real time, especially so if they lie by paltering. Psychologist Robert Feldman, author of The Liar in Your Life, sees this as worrying both on a personal and on a macro level. "When we're lied to by people in ability, information technology ruins our confidence in political institutions – it makes the population very cynical about [their] real motivations."
Lying can and does conspicuously serve a devious social purpose. It can help someone pigment a ameliorate picture than the truth, or help a politician contrivance an uncomfortable question. "Information technology'southward unethical and it makes our democracy worse. Just it'southward how human noesis works," says Rogers.
Unfortunately, the prevalence of lies might stalk from the way nosotros are brought up. Lies play a part in our social interactions from a very immature age. We tell young children about tooth fairies and Santa, or encourage a child to be grateful for an unwanted present. "We give our kids very mixed letters," says Feldman. "What they ultimately acquire is that even though honesty is the all-time policy, it's also at times fine and preferable to prevarication about things."
So side by side fourth dimension y'all hear a fact that sounds odd, or someone to be deflecting a question, be aware that what y'all call back is the truth may very well be deceptive.
---
Melissa Hogenboom is BBC Future'southward feature author, she is @melissasuzanneh on twitter.
Bring together 800,000+ Future fans by liking us on Facebook , or follow us on Twitter .
If you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter , chosen "If You Only Read 6 Things This Week". A handpicked pick of stories from BBC Future, Civilization, Capital, and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.
Source: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20171114-the-disturbing-art-of-lying-by-telling-the-truth